Matthew R. Lynde, Senior Vice President, Cornerstone Research to Speak at KC’s Event
The Knowledge Group/The Knowledge Congress Live Webcast Series, the leading producer of regulatory focused webcasts, has announced today that Matthew R. Lynde, Senior Vice President, Cornerstone Research will speak at the Knowledge Group’s webcast entitled: " Reasonable Royalty Damages, Apportionment and Expert Opinions in Light of Exmark Case LIVE Webcast.
- New York, NY (1888PressRelease) May 24, 2018 - For further details, please visit:
https://www.theknowledgegroup.org/webcasts/reasonable-royalty-damages/
About Matthew R. Lynde
Mathew R. Lynde leads the intellectual property practice at Cornerstone Research. Dr. Lynde’s expert testimony has been accepted in domestic and international courts, tribunals, and arbitration panels in more than sixty-five instances; his work as a consultant and educator spans a range of IP portfolio and valuation issues. In Microsoft v. Motorola, Dr. Lynde calculated reasonable and nondiscriminatory (RAND) royalties in the first bench trail to set a RAND range for standard essential patents.
Dr. Lynde has testified in several other significant cases involving the high-tech, medical, and life sciences industries. In addition to intellectual property, he works in antitrust and competition, securities, and breach of contract matters.
Dr. Lynde’s has more than thirty-five years of experience as an applied economist in government, academia, and business. Prior to joining Cornerstone Research, he was a professor at City University of New York and a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers, heading up its Silicon Valley intellectual property practice.
About Cornerstone Research
Cornerstone Research provides economic and financial consulting and expert testimony in all phases of complex disputes and regulatory investigations. The firm has 700 staff and offices in Boston, Chicago, London, Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco, Silicon Valley, and Washington DC.
Event Synopsis:
As the number of cases filed under patent infringement continues to grow, methods in determining related damages have significantly evolved as well. In a recent case involving Exmark Manufacturing Company and Briggs & Stratton Power Products, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed that reasonable royalty calculations have important implications in patent infringement. The jury trial between the U.S.-based companies has found that the defendant infringed the contested patent, and thus, awarded the plaintiff with over $24 million in damages.
Given the outcomes in Exmark, the Federal Circuit has signaled greater flexibility when apportioning damages by allowing the use of royalty rate in addition to the royalty base when valuing a patented invention's contribution to a larger multicomponent product.
In this LIVE Webcast, a panel of thought leaders and professionals brought together by The Knowledge Group will provide the audience with an in-depth analysis of the important information in determining Reasonable Royalty Damages, Apportionment and Expert Opinions in Light of Exmark Case. Speakers will also identify key trends and issues involving this significant topic.
Key topics include:
- Reasonable Royalty Damages, Apportionment and Expert Opinions: Fundamentals
- Overview of the Exmark Manufacturing Company v. Briggs & Stratton Power Products Case
- Royalty Rate v. Royalty Base
- Calculation Challenges
- Implications to Patent Infringement Litigation
- Recent Court Decisions
About The Knowledge Group/The Knowledge Congress Live Webcast Series
The Knowledge Group was established with the mission to produce unbiased, objective, and educational live webinars that examine industry trends and regulatory changes from a variety of different perspectives. The goal is to deliver a unique multilevel analysis of an important issue affecting business in a highly focused format. To contact or register for an event, please visit: http://theknowledgegroup.org/
###
space
space
Satisfied Users & 
Approved Press Releases
Print
Email
Report Spam