International Stem Cell Corporation Not Adversely Affected By Stem Cell Research Funding Ban
International Stem Cell Corporation announced that its therapeutic programs using human parthenogenetic stem cells are not negatively affected by the recent action of a federal district judge blocking federal funding of embryonic stem cell research.
- (1888PressRelease) August 27, 2010 - International Stem Cell Corporation announced that the recent action of a federal district judge blocking federal funding of embryonic stem cell research is not expected to have negative affects on ISCO's therapeutic programs using its human parthenogenetic stem cells.
According to ISCO's Chairman Ken Aldrich, "Because we have never depended on federal or state money to fund our research, the new ruling is simply not applicable to any of our programs in the US or any of our international efforts. Although we believe anything that restricts legitimate scientific research is detrimental to science and our Country and hope the ruling is quickly reversed, the ruling could in a strange way benefit ISCO by creating additional incentives for researchers to use our parthenogenetic stem cell lines."
Because ISCO's technology, parthenogenesis, does not destroy or damage a viable human embryo, its parthenogenetic stem cell lines ('hpSC') offer an alternative way to continue research previously done with embryonic cell lines without raising ethical issues about the destruction of life. Published peer-reviewed papers have shown hpSC to be 'pluripotent,' a characteristic shared with embryonic stem cells that allows them to become tissues leading to all the cells found in the human body. Therefore, ISCO's hpSC lines offer an alternative to the ethical issues that continue to be problematic for embryonic stem cells.
When enacted, legislation prohibiting the creation of a human embryo for research purposes prohibited both successful methods, such as fertilization, as well as less understood methods such as parthenogenesis. Parthenogenetic methods since developed by ISCO do not create human embryos that could become viable human beings, yet can result in pluripotent hpSC lines with potential therapeutic value. 'The recent court ruling may cause Congress to revisit its legislation. If so, then ISCO's research showing its hpSC lines present an alternative to embryonic stem cells, without raising the ethical concerns about the creation or destruction of viable human life, may lead to Congress allowing federal funding of hpSC in future legislation. ISCO would then be free to provide hpSC lines to federally-funded researchers and move more of our work back into the US from foreign jurisdictions,' said Jeffrey Janus, Senior Vice President of ISCO and one of its founders.
ABOUT INTERNATIONAL STEM CELL CORPORATION (ISCO.OB)
International Stem Cell Corporation is a California-based biotechnology company focused on therapeutic and research products. ISCO's core technology, parthenogenesis, results in creation of pluripotent human stem cells from unfertilized oocytes (eggs). These proprietary cells avoid ethical issues associated with use or destruction of viable human embryos and, unlike all other major stem cell types, can be immune matched and be a source of therapeutic cells with minimal rejection after transplantation into hundreds of millions of individuals across racial groups. ISCO also produces and markets specialized cells and growth media for therapeutic research worldwide through its subsidiary Lifeline Cell Technology, develops a line of cosmeceutical products via its subsidiary Lifeline Skin Care and advances novel human stem cell-based therapies where cells have been proven to be efficacious but traditional small molecule and protein therapeutics do not. More information is available at ISCO's website,
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements pertaining to anticipated technological developments and therapeutic applications, the potential benefits of collaborations, affiliations, and other opportunities for the company and its subsidiaries, along with other statements about the future expectations, beliefs, goals, plans, or prospects expressed by management constitute forward-looking statements. Any statements that are not historical fact (including, but not limited to statements that contain words such as "will," "should," "believes," "plans," "anticipates," "expects," "estimates,") should also be considered to be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, risks inherent in the development and/or commercialization of potential products, uncertainty in the results of clinical trials or regulatory approvals, need and ability to obtain future capital, application of capital resources among competing uses, and maintenance of intellectual property rights. Actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements and as such should be evaluated together with the many uncertainties that affect the company's business, particularly those mentioned in the cautionary statements found in the company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings. The company disclaims any intent or obligation to update these forward-looking statements.
###
space
space